铜锡复合成矿研究进展与展望
作者:
基金项目:

本文为国家自然科学基金重大研究计划培育项目(编号92162103)和国家重点研发计划项目(编号2018YFC0603902)联合资助的成果。


Research progress and prospect on Cu- Sn coupled metallogeny
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    铜与锡具有不同的地球化学性质,然而铜锡共生或复合成矿现象在世界主要铜、锡成矿带中比较常见,如中国的右江、南岭(湘南)、大兴安岭南段(内蒙东部)、葡萄牙伊比利亚、秘鲁安第斯、英格兰德文郡、德国厄尔士山、日本西南、俄罗斯远东、加拿大新不伦瑞克等成矿带均为铜锡复合矿床的集中产区。铜锡复合矿床主要为岩浆热液矿床,以矽卡岩型、脉状矿床为主,兼有火山热液沉积型、斑岩型及云英岩型等。铜矿体的主要矿石矿物为黄铜矿,兼有斑铜矿、黝铜矿、辉铜矿等;锡矿体的主要矿石矿物为锡石,兼有黝锡矿。铜锡复合矿床的成矿物质来源(尤其是铜、锡成矿元素的来源是否具有一致性)尚有不少争议,锡普遍被认为是岩浆来源,而铜的来源具有多样性。成矿流体演化过程中的氧化还原环境的改变及流体的混合是导致铜锡复合成矿的主要原因。目前对于铜锡复合成矿的研究,主要是从矿床的年代学、单矿物(黄铜矿、锡石)微量元素及传统同位素地球化学、流体包裹体等方面入手,但对厘定铜锡复合成矿过程的作用有限。铜锡复合矿床的成因及勘查模型的建立具有重要的理论价值及现实意义。本文提出未来研究可以从多种非传统稳定同位素(例如Cu、Sn、W、Zn同位素)的联合示踪探索、成矿贯通矿物(如白钨矿、闪锌矿、石榴子石、电气石、磷灰石等)的原位地球化学特征精细对比分析、流体包裹体以及低温热年代学的差异深度成矿与隆升剥蚀研究等方向入手,精确厘定铜锡复合的成矿物质来源、流体演化过程以及找矿勘查方向。

    Abstract:

    Copper and tin have distinguishable geochemical properties whereas Cu- Sn paragenesis or coupled mineralization is common in the major Cu- Sn metallogenic belts of the world. For example, the Youjiang, Nanling (southern Hunan Province) and southern Great Xingan Range (eastern Inner Mongolia) in China, the Iberia in Portugal, the Andes in Peru, the Cornubian in England, the Erzgebirge in Germany, southwest Japan, Far East Russia, and New Brunswick in Canada are all characterized by intensive distribution of coupled Cu- Sn deposits. Coupled Cu- Sn deposits are mostly magmatic hydrothermal deposits that are dominated by skarn type and vein type. Volcanic hydrothermal sedimentary type, porphyry type, and greisen type are also present. Ore minerals of Cu ore bodies mainly include chalcopyrite, with the presence of bornite, tetrahedrite, and chalcocite. In contrast, ore minerals of tin ore bodies are cassiterite and minor stannite. The source of ore- forming materials of Cu- Sn coupled deposits (especially whether the source of copper and tin elements is consistent) remains highly controversial. Tin is generally considered to be of magmatic origin, while the source of copper may be diversified. The change of redox environment and fluid mixing during the ore- forming fluid evolution may be the key trigger for Cu- Sn coupled mineralization. Available studies on Cu- Sn coupled mineralization focused on chronology of deposits, trace element and conventional isotopic geochemistry of single minerals (e.g., chalcopyrite, cassiterite), and fluid inclusions, which have limitation in determining the Cu- Sn coupled mineralization process. The genesis and the establishment of exploration model for coupled Cu- Sn deposits are of great theoretical and practical importance. In this paper, we propose that future studies can be conducted by using combined tracing of multiple unconventional stable isotopes (e.g., Cu, Sn, W, Zn isotopes), precise comparable analyses of in situ geochemical characteristics of marked ore minerals (e.g. scheelite, sphalerite, garnet, tourmaline, apatite), fluid inclusions, low- temperature thermochronology (e.g., mineralization at different depth and uplift- exhumation histories), to precisely probe into the source of ore- forming materials, fluid evolution, and mineral exploration of Cu- Sn coupled mineralization.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李欢,吴经华,孙文博,刘飚.2023.铜锡复合成矿研究进展与展望[J].地质学报,97(1):262-277.
Li Huan, Wu Jinghua, Sun Wenbo, Liu Biao.2023. Research progress and prospect on Cu- Sn coupled metallogeny[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica,97(1):262-277.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-18
  • 最后修改日期:2022-05-02
  • 录用日期:2022-05-06
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-02-07