浅谈矿床学研究中的一些问题—答黄典豪研究员
作者:

Reply to Prof. Huang Dianhao
Author:
单位:
  • 中国地质科学院矿产资源研究所,北京, 100037    
  • Institute of Mineral Resources, Chines Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, 100037    
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    将今论古地探索和推测在地质历史期间发生的重大事件和成矿作用;从科学和社会发展历史视角叙述对于矿床类型认知的历史变迁,回顾科学论文引文的过去与现在;客观对待一些新发现和新认识,崛起的中国将有更多新认识和新发现,鼓励国人进入新常态。

    Abstract:

    The paper discusses some important tectonic events and related mineralizations through geological history with uniformitaranism, and promotes better to understand the ore deposit types from Russian styles we used before to American—European style we use now. The paper also describes that the situation of papers’ citing in past 30~40 years in China have changed a lot from quite a few references cited in the papers before 2000 and are gradually getting normal after 2000. The earlier papers cited in recent papers used some data of even earlier papers but did not them, which causes much dispute of intellectual property right. Some Chinese peoples are not use to have "Created in China" very well since following western colleagues for a lifetime. However, they have to face the fact that China is rising and "created in China" will be more and more.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

毛景文.2015.浅谈矿床学研究中的一些问题—答黄典豪研究员[J].地质论评,61(5):1001-1006,[DOI].
MAO Jingwen.2015. Reply to Prof. Huang Dianhao[J]. Geological Review,61(5):1001-1006.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-09
  • 最后修改日期:2015-08-30
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-09-17