桂西地区古生代地层中的火山灰特征及其意义
作者:
基金项目:

本文为中国矿产地质志项目(编号: DD20221695, DD20190379, DD20160346)、广西地质矿产勘查开发局项目(编号:KD- \[2023\]- XZ- 050)、广西地质矿产勘查开发局项目“广西寒武系生物地层划分对比及沉积环境研究”(编号:GXDK202432)和广西自然资源厅项目“广西地质遗迹综合调查评价”的成果


Characteristics and significance of volcanic ashes in Palaeozoic formation in western Guangxi
Author:
单位:
  • 广西地质调查院,南宁,530023    
  • 广西地质调查院,南宁,530023    
  • 南宁学院,南宁,530200    
  • 桂林理工大学广西隐伏金属矿产勘查重点实验室,广西桂林,541004    
  • 广西地质调查院,南宁,530023    
  • 广西地质调查院,南宁,530023    
  • 广西地质调查院,南宁,530023    
  • 广西地质调查院,南宁,530023    
  • 广西地质调查院,南宁,530023    
  • 广西地质调查院,南宁,530023    
  • Guangxi Institute of Geological Survey, Nanning, 530023    
  • Guangxi Institute of Geological Survey, Nanning, 530023    
  • Nanning University, Nanning, 530200    
  • Guangxi Key Laboratory of Hidden Metallic Ore Deposits Exploration, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi, 541004    
  • Guangxi Institute of Geological Survey, Nanning, 530023    
  • Guangxi Institute of Geological Survey, Nanning, 530023    
  • Guangxi Institute of Geological Survey, Nanning, 530023    
  • Guangxi Institute of Geological Survey, Nanning, 530023    
  • Guangxi Institute of Geological Survey, Nanning, 530023    
  • Guangxi Institute of Geological Survey, Nanning, 530023    
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    桂西地区古生代台地相火山灰研究几乎空白,其类型和来源不明,影响着构造演化的深入研究。通过线路调查、显微构造和元素地球化学研究,发现寒武系芙蓉统唐家坝组粉砂质泥岩、石炭系杜内阶都安组底部含铝岩系、二叠系乐平统底部含铝岩系及其顶板海侵系列存在火山灰,均发育熔蚀和脱玻结构;其中,芙蓉统火山灰中可见石英斑晶、长石微晶、白色玻璃、熔融包裹体等,多晶,属于远源的流纹质火山灰;杜内阶火山灰中斑晶以斜长石、辉石为主,另见玻璃和岩屑,锆石U- Pb年龄显示多峰,主要峰值年龄段为392~340 Ma,加权平均年龄为370±7.4 Ma,另有一次峰年龄段503~404 Ma,含铝岩系富集LREE、Th、U、Pb,亏损Nb、Ta、Sr、P、Ti,但富集和亏损程度不大,弱Eu异常,Cr、Ni、Co强烈富集,火山灰来自近源的拉斑玄武岩浆;乐平统含铝岩系顶板的海侵系列及顶部PTB界线(二叠系—三叠系界线)附近的火山灰以流纹质为主,两者均为近源。芙蓉统酸性火山灰来自原特提斯岛弧火山,华南加里东运动为原特提斯洋—陆俯冲的板内远程响应;泥盆纪晚期—石炭纪早期基性火山灰来自桂西所处的小洋盆内区域火山喷发;乐平世酸性火山灰来自华南西南缘的古特提斯松马造山带。火山灰对“沟—弧—盆”模式的厘定提供了重要证据。

    Abstract:

    There are hardly studies on volcanic ashs in platform facies of Paleozoic so that the type and provenance remain unknown, and hinder further study on tectonic evolution, so it is great significant to find and determine the ashes of volcano.Methods: Line investigation, zircon geochronology, microscopic research and element analysis.Results: Volcanic ashes can be found in silty mudstone of Tangjiaba Formation of Furongian of Cambrian, and in aluminum- bearing rock series at the bottom of Du’an Formation of Tournaisian of Carboniferous, and in the aluminium- bearing rock series at the bottom of Lopingian of Permian and overlying transgression series, all of volcanic ashes show resorption and devitrified structures. The volcanic ashes of Furongian display quartz porphyry, feldspar baby- crystal, white glass, melt inclusion, and the rock is crystal- rich that meaning rhyolite source. Plagioclase and pyroxene are the main phenocrysts in the aluminium- bearing rock series of Tournaisian, and show a little of glass, while the U- Pb ages of zircon give several peaks, with the main series age of 392~340 Ma,with the weighted mean age of 370±7.4Ma,and secondary series age of 503~404 Ma; meanwhile the aluminium- bearing rock series enrich in LREE, Th, U and Pb, and depleted in Nb, Ta, Sr, P , Ti, but the varies of enrichment and depletion is small, whereas the Eu anomaly are weak, and Cr, Ni and Co are strongly enriched, suggesting that the ashes derived from tholeiitic basalts nearby. The volcanic ashes in the superimposed transgression series and in the limestone adjacent the P/T boundary are mainly rhyolitic,, and both of them were proximal.Conclusions: The acid volcanic ash of Furongian came from the Proto- Tethys island arc, and the Caledonian movement was the far- field reaction to the Proto- Tethys ocean—continent subduction in South China. The volcanic ash in the aluminium- bearing rock series of Tournaisian came from regional volcano within a branch ocean which contained west Guangxi. In the Late Permian, the volcanic ash came from the Song Ma belt of Paleo- Tethys in the margin of South China. The volcanic ashes provide a strong support for the determination of the “trench—arc—basin” model.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张启连,王学恒,周辉,刘希军,韦访,李活松,李玉坤,利奂章,谢植贵,辛晓卫.2024.桂西地区古生代地层中的火山灰特征及其意义[J].地质论评,70(5):2024050034,[DOI].
ZHANG Qilian, WANG Xueheng, ZHOU Hui, LIU Xijun, WEI Fang, LI Huosong, LI Yukun, LI Huanzhang, XIE Zhigui, XIN Xiaowei.2024. Characteristics and significance of volcanic ashes in Palaeozoic formation in western Guangxi[J]. Geological Review,70(5):2024050034.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-08
  • 最后修改日期:2024-06-25
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-10-19